Get in touch with us

We would like to hear from you

Whether you have a question about our content, a correction to suggest, or simply want to discuss how we approach peer-to-peer lending topics, we are listening.

Ways to reach our team

Our location

Louisa Ryland House, 44 Newhall Street, Birmingham, B3 3PL, United Kingdom

Standard response hours

Monday to Friday, nine in the morning until five in the afternoon, United Kingdom time. We aim to respond within two working days.

Factual corrections flagged as urgent are reviewed within one working day.

We triage every message by the nature of the request. A factual correction on a published article is treated as urgent — we take accuracy seriously. A general question about peer-to-peer lending concepts gets a considered, thorough reply rather than a fast one. A collaboration enquiry is reviewed by our editorial lead before we respond. Choose the priority level that best reflects what you need.

Contact information

We are a small team and we read every message that comes in personally

Phone

+44 161 184 7123

Email

content@dovaselunix.com

Address

Louisa Ryland House, 44 Newhall Street, Birmingham, B3 3PL, United Kingdom

A note on how we handle your messages

What to expect

We are a small, deliberate team — which means we do not use automated replies to close tickets and move on. When you write to us, a person reads your message and considers it carefully before responding. That takes a little longer than a bot, and we think the trade-off is worth it. If you are submitting a factual correction about something we have published on peer-to-peer lending — a default rate figure, a regulatory detail, a platform description — please flag it as urgent. We treat accuracy as the most important thing we produce, and we will review your correction promptly. For general questions about lending mechanics, diversification approaches, or how we source our content, expect a considered reply within two working days. We will not rush an answer that deserves careful thought. For collaboration or editorial enquiries, our lead researcher reviews those personally and responds when we have something meaningful to say, rather than sending a holding reply.
Writer reviewing a message at a desk